I have to
thank everyone for their comments on my last post regarding the Jeep, amusing,
sympathetic and in John Delaney’s case, bloody useful even though I am now left
completely confounded! I am following up
Beach Bum’s lead to Quadratec.com and Nigel’s advice to email, rather than
phone. I had been looking for a quick
solution but now, I guess, Marcia will just have to get used to driving in the
three tonne truck again until I get this sorted.
I had to
laugh at the suggestion I needed a ‘Toe Truck’.
My toe is improving albeit very slowly and painfully. I did promise the Fifth Columnist no more
graphic photos so you will all just have to take my word for it but yes, it was
jolly uncomfortable crawling under a vehicle in the rain (it has not rained
here in months, the one time I really did not want it to rain, it poured yet
more misery upon me) with a sore appendage that no matter how hard I tried to avoid such an occurrence,
managed to stub on every sharp object underneath the car my knee jerk reactions
to which added a few more puncture wounds to my leg and head and turned the damp air blue.
On the
subject of comments, I really did not expect many from those whose knowledge of
things mechanical was limited but Fifth Columnist, whose interest in cars
extends only to a small nod of appreciation to his chauffeur when noting the
waxed-to-perfection coachwork of his classic 600 Mercedes Pullman as he climbs
in came up with the best:
“If you keep ogling the nieces Marcia won’t need
much persuasion to drive the truck over you, and you might worry more about
your spleen rather than the jeep's spline.”
I have to confess, as she
started the car up and stuck it in gear, it did occur to me that everything I
own is in her name.
I’d like to think she
carefully followed my instructions so that I could identify the problem but,
being slightly neurotic, I could also imagine her calculating the outcome. She has this grudging respect for me knowing
that I am a far better mechanic than the locals so was best placed to problem
solve and restore to her a working Jeep and that if she did squish me into the
dirt, the car would be seized as evidence.
So long as I remain useful, I think I am safe but in the meantime, I have
hoisted in the gypsy’s warning about her nieces.
Anyway, the car situation
merits a summary.
John D has discovered that according
to the factory records, Chrysler reckon my car is a 1996 4,0 litre , six cylinder Jeep Grand Cherokee. Now even an apprentice mechanic on his first
day at work can count plug leads. I have
eight of them. Furthermore, a six
cylinder Chrysler has all its cylinders in line under one cylinder head. A V8 has eight cylinders arranged in two
banks, forming a V and requiring two cylinder heads. I have two cylinder heads. I’m not a mechanic by trade but I was
becoming reasonably confident that there was a V8 under my bonnet (or hood if
you are American). Besides, it says V8
on the back of the car.
That looks like a factory installed Chrysler V8 to me. I could be wrong of course. |
I checked the handbook
entitled ‘1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee’. It
described a 4.0 six-in-line and a 5.2 litre V8. I
checked the vehicle registration documents.
They described the vehicle as fitted with a 4.497 litre V8. Did
Chrysler ever make a 4.5 litre V8?
John D (blast his eyes) suggested the car might
be a chop job, a car with which someone had gone to all the trouble of lifting
out a six-in-line and dropping in a V8.
If that is the case, whoever did it went to extraordinary lengths, right
down to applying the factory under bonnet stickers.
Anyone could forge those stickers with an HP printer and a bit of glue... |
The handbook announces the car
as a 1996 model but the Americans are fond of releasing new models in one year
and declaring them as of the next model year.
A car designed during the years preceding 2013 and released that year
is, therefore, announced as the 2014 model.
Yes, I know it is desperately confusing and defies all logic, I guess
the designers and marketing men are all Trekkies and have wasted their youth
collecting New-in-Box Star Trek memorabilia and wearing underpants far too
tight to let testosterone take its normal course and modify behaviour from
childish fantasy to reality.
The trouble is, if it is an
American 1996 model, which means it was probably built in 1995. That means it was built before the transfer
case was modified. That means I cannot
run the car without the front drive shaft.
To add to my confusion, I read
the instructions contained in the vehicle manuals, all of which were supplied
with the vehicle. It clearly states, and
unless the guy chopping the vehicle employed an outstanding forger to modify
the graphics printed on the centre console to factory standards and then went
to all the extra trouble to wire in the relevant warning lights on the dash,
that the means of switching between modes of traction is supplied by a Quadro-Trac
transfer case. But, according to the
manual, Quadro Trac does not have a separate 2WD function which clearly, mine
has. When I first bought the vehicle, I
tested all the traction functions. In
2WD I was able to pull off rooster tails and even posted videos of me doing so. In part time 4WD and Full Time 4WD it stuck
to the ground like glue and in 4WD LO the car appeared willing to climb the
side of a building. It all worked so I
doubt there is a problem with the transfer case. I also doubt that this car is in any
condition other than when it left the factory, wear and tear excluded. Could it be that this was a cross over model
and that although the factory was still fitting the old transfer case they were
fitting the new model year centre consoles marked up with Quadro-Trac? Mine is definitely marked up Quadro Trac yet
has the 2WD slot which, according to the factory handbook, Quadro Tracs do not
have. And the factory VIN database can
say what it likes, this car has a V8 complete with all the relevant factory
stickers. Confused? Yes I am rather confused.
According to the driver's handbook, what you are seeing is a figment of your imagination. Quadro-Trac does NOT have a seperate 2WD position. |
When you are up to your neck
in Alligators, it is bloody hard to remember that the original intention was
just to drain the swamp. All I want to
know is: can I drive the car with the front prop shaft disconnected?
Anyway, it isn’t going to fix
itself so I got underneath the car today and hauled the shaft off. I need either the UJ rebuild kit or a
complete new prop shaft, I don’t care. I
just want the right part. You have no
idea how pissed off a man can get when he tracks his part all the way across
the world on the DHL on-line package tracking system, slogs into town to pay
the import duty when it arrives in-country only to discover it is the wrong
part.
This is the bit I need. It's a yard long and weighs a tonne. This one's fucked. |